| ↑ click! |
& SUBSCRIBE |
 In his article "How Britain's Surrender to the UN Led to Charlie Gard's Fate," William Estrada writes - "I believe the British government bears responsibility for surrendering far too much power to the United Nations years ago. In 1989, U.N. bureaucrats finished a multilateral treaty called the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child. The U.N. and globalists ....claimed that it would protect children. But the reality is that this convention diminishes the role of parents in the care of their own children and leaves them at the mercy of the state." The central provision of the Convention on the Rights of the Child is found in the seemingly innocuous language of Article 3: 'In all actions concerning children … the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration. States Parties undertake to ensure the child such protection and care as is necessary for his or her well-being, taking into account the rights and duties of his or her parents …'" This means that states which became parties to the treaty thus take priority over parents for "protecting" their children. The U.S. also signed that U.N. treaty but thankfully it was never ratified by the Senate, so it hasn't gone into effect in the U.S. All it would take, though, is for a new, globalism-inclined U.S. President to push for it and the Senate to vote for it. Then our children would would effectively become wards of the state, like Charlie Gard. Get the whole story: read the full article & get our free weekly newsletter: subscribe below! |